Market for Organs
Webquest by Mary McGlasson & Nancy Short, Chandler-Gilbert Community College

Introduction | Assignment | Conclusion

Introduction

In class, we've discussed markets as they apply to everyday kinds of commodities -- apples, cars, basketball tickets, etc. -- but what about  market applications to non-traditional areas?

DID YOU KNOW . . . ?


Introduction | Assignment | Conclusion

Assignment
To complete your task, you must PRINT OUT THIS ASSIGNMENT NOW. Please read carefully through the entire assignment, then answer the following (responses do not need to be typed, but they do need to be legible):
 

1. CLICK HERE to go to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS): Critical Data.

According to the most recent UNOS figures, a total of __________ people are waiting for a kidney transplant, while _________ total kidney donors were available last year.

Is the market for kidneys in equilibrium? How do you know?
 
 
 

If the market is not in equilibrium, are we currently looking at a market shortage or a market surplus? How do you know (identify by using precise and appropriate terminology from class or from the textbook)?
 
 
 
 
 

How large is the shortage/surplus, if it exists (i.e., how many units)? ______________
 
 

What are the implications of these numbers? I.e., what does this mean for individuals and society?
 
 
 
 
 



2. Compare your 2000-2001 figures to the 1991 figures that were given in the  introduction of this assignment.
    Was the market in equilibrium back in 1991? _______

    If not, was there a shortage or a surplus, and how large?______________________________________
 

    What numerical changes have been occurring in demand over the last 10 years?
 

    Show what has been happening to the demand for kidneys in a (fully-labelled) market diagram:


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Market for Kidneys

    What factors can you think of that have most likely been contributing to the change in the market that you have illustrated above? For example, you might say that people adopting more health-conscious lifestyles leads to longer lifespans, which in turn alters the demand for kidneys. For this question, I'd like you to write down at least three factors (more than three is OK, too!). If you consider what drives the demand side of this market, you should be able to come up with several factors on your own. If you really get stuck, you may find some ideas to get you started at the National Kidney Foundation (click here) website.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



3. Who are the current suppliers in the market for kidneys, and what are their incentives to supply this particular commodity with the existing market restrictions? (When responding to this question, consider that as discussed in class, sellers in a market are motivated by profit -- how do these suppliers "profit" or "benefit" if the price is legally set at zero?)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Remember from our market exercise in class: even if we don't know the precise equilibrium price, we can determine a possible range of prices. The following questions are designed to help determine whether there are any predictions we could make about a possible equilibrium price in a non-restricted market for kidneys.

4. What would your personal (rock-bottom) selling price for one of your kidneys be? $_____________________
Justify your answer below by discussion your cost considerations -- both monetary and non-monetary -- as a supplier.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

TAKE A SURVEY. Ask five other people (NOT your Economics classmates) what their rock-bottom price would be. Make sure that you DO explain to them all of the potential costs that you have considered above, but DO NOT tell them what your rock-bottom price is -- it may color the responses that you get:
 

Person#
Minimum Acceptable Price
1
    $
2
    $
3
    $
4
    $
5
    $

In September 1999, a living-donor kidney was put up for auction on e-bay. According to CNN , bidding reached $_________________ before the auction site blocked the sale as an illegal transaction.

Based on the information that you've gathered here, the minimum observed selling price that we have in this market is $_____________, while the maximum observed buying price is $_______________. While this may not represent the full range of possible prices in the market (as demonstrated by our market exercise in class), we certainly have some subset of the complete range. Perhaps more importantly, we now have information that we did not have before.

What would be your best guess as to where the equilibrium price would be? Support your educated guess with the data that you have collected here, and with intelligent speculation as to whether/why the price would more likely converge at the higher end or the lower end of the possible price range (INSTRUCTOR'S NOTE: taking the average of the high price and the low price is NOT intelligent speculation, unless you have a powerful explanation as to why the price would be expected to converge exactly in the middle of the price range).
 
 
 
 
 


The following questions are designed to help you consider what would happen if the government allowed a price greater than zero.

5. Who would be the suppliers be in a market for kidneys that was free of price restrictions, and what are their incentives to supply this particular commodity?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Consider both potential positive and negative outcomes of allowing payments to kidney suppliers. Write your ideas in the table below:

IMPORTANT NOTE FROM THE INSTRUCTOR:
PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME  ABOUT people left in bathtubs of ice with their kidneys stolen. This story is an urban legend, a hoax.  You can either trust me on this or check for yourself at  www.snopes.comor any other urban legend site. This sort of kidney theft is, for the moment, medically impossible.
 

Beneficial Outcomes
Negative Outcomes

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Introduction | Assignment | Conclusion

Conclusion

You have now considered some of the existing difficulties with both sides of the market for kidneys, the existing system, and considered the possibility of an alternative system. On balance, do you believe that the current system of barring monetary payments (or any other benefits to organ providers) is preferable, or would providing compensation for suppliers yield a better result (for individuals and society as a whole)?

Response: